collapse

* Simple Portal Archived Forum

This is an Archive Forum.

The content in this forum may be out-of-date or have been superseded by newer information, and links in forum pages to other sites may not work.
This forum contains archives for future reference.

Visit our thread at Simple Machines Forum for current support.

SMF 2.1 users: EhPortal is a ported version of Simple Portal specifically designed for the SMF 2.1 branch.
Please visit web-develop.ca to download EhPortal and for its support.

* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 512
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.

* Shoutbox

Refresh History
  • Shoutbox is not for support!
  • {OCS}MasterSeal: Yup, Still adore SP
    April 21, 2019, 07:08:06 PM
  • {OCS}MasterSeal: STILL love SP :)
    November 24, 2018, 05:05:50 AM
  • ♦ Ninja ZX-10RR ♦: <3 aegersz
    September 13, 2018, 03:36:09 PM
  • aegersz: I STILL <3 LOVE SimplePortal
    September 13, 2018, 07:11:39 AM
  • aegersz: o LOVE you guys - Simple Portal rocks !
    May 09, 2018, 05:18:59 AM
  • Chen Zhen: our apologies for the site being down.. please read server issues topic
    March 22, 2018, 05:32:38 AM
  • {OCS}MasterSeal: LOL PLEASE forget I just posted that. I found the answer in my own dang post back in 2015. lol sorry!
    July 04, 2017, 10:47:55 PM
  • {OCS}MasterSeal: I know this SB isnt' for support, but I just have a general question. Who would I contact to find out where SP stores its block info? Is it DB driven or files? I searched the site but came up with nothing. probably my fault any insight is appreciated.
    July 04, 2017, 10:43:36 PM
  • ♦ Ninja ZX-10RR ♦: Excuse me but what does Simpleportal have to deal with that?
    February 05, 2017, 08:21:14 PM
  • WhiteEagle: of course IMHO that site appears to be dead :(
    February 04, 2017, 01:08:05 PM
  • WhiteEagle: If I can get that, then I'll use it for that site...
    February 04, 2017, 01:07:35 PM
  • WhiteEagle: decided to not use SMF for any projects, unless I can get a copy of the premium version of the fanfiction archive plugin
    February 04, 2017, 01:06:54 PM
  • expertdecisions: cloudflare
    January 28, 2017, 08:01:47 AM
  • aegersz: SM release 2.0.13 !
    January 12, 2017, 06:00:13 AM
  • raffo: Tks Emanuele, even if I didn't understand the fix :D
    November 07, 2016, 02:01:20 AM
  • emanuele: [link]
    November 01, 2016, 12:43:50 PM
  • emanuele: raffo: the English support board is a good place. ;)
    November 01, 2016, 12:43:38 PM
  • raffo: Where can I find the fix for the shoutbox?
    November 01, 2016, 05:06:09 AM
  • {OCS}MasterSeal: To the SP team, I make a point to come here and thank you as much as possible for your work.  so again, THANK YOU!
    October 28, 2016, 10:38:05 AM
  • emanuele: That's indeed funny, the limit is present only in the patch and not the full install.
    October 22, 2016, 06:14:58 PM

* Recent Posts

Adding Forums Button to Nav bar by jirapon
[August 01, 2019, 09:07:12 AM]


Re: Board Icons by ♦ Ninja ZX-10RR ♦
[July 30, 2019, 04:03:41 PM]


MOVED: Czech translation???? by ♦ Ninja ZX-10RR ♦
[July 30, 2019, 03:04:51 PM]


Board Icons by jirapon
[July 30, 2019, 07:28:44 AM]


Re: Thankyou Simpleportal, by ♦ Ninja ZX-10RR ♦
[July 29, 2019, 09:41:29 AM]

Blocks speak! Do you have an interest in getting more blocks - or even making your own? The Blocks Board is for you!

Author Topic: sp resizing for sp_articles  (Read 2908 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AngelinaBelle

  • Comrade
  • *
  • Posts: 4870
  • Gender: Female
  • SMF Version: 2 RC3
  • SP Version: 2.3.2
sp resizing for sp_articles
« on: March 11, 2010, 01:55:32 PM »
I noticed that  function sp_image_resize() handles class="sp_article" in a way I hadn't expected. (though maybe I should have).
It basically uses it as a search string. So, if the element has a SRC property and class=sp_article, it will explicitly add a height and width to the element, on the fly, scaling the image to a fixed 300 width.
 
I am inexperienced here, so I would like to ask a small number of questions from those of you who have actually tried out the different options here.
1) a) Why is this manipulating all the <imga tags directly a better choice than setting max-width for img.sp_article?
    c) Why not dynamically-manipulated stylesheets, à la http://www.hunlock.com/blogs/Totally_Pwn_CSS_with_Javascript)
(no, I have never tried dynamic CSS. yet. It's on my list.)
 
2) Would extending/supplementing sp_image_resize be a good way to manipulate other things users might have embedded, like <object  and <embed (from the [pdf] tag)? Implementation would be simple -- just iterate over "img", "object", "embed" , using the appropriate javascript DOM objects and properties in each case...
 
 
 
 
 
« Last Edit: March 11, 2010, 02:04:23 PM by AngelinaBelle »
Please to keep this website running, if you like SimplePortal, make a
one-time subscription. Thank you for your support.

Have you tried the SimplePortal documentation?

Offline AngelinaBelle

  • Comrade
  • *
  • Posts: 4870
  • Gender: Female
  • SMF Version: 2 RC3
  • SP Version: 2.3.2
Re: sp resizing for sp_articles
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2010, 09:51:33 PM »
OK, so I'm replying to my own question AGAIN, after I've ground my teeth on the code for a bit.
 
I'm happy with my first tests. It seems to work well even if some *****ss has used [html]<img height=..... in the posting.  It seems like clean code to me.
Is this a good idea?
How do you think it compares to the current way sp_image_resize is handled in php and JavaScript?
 
Maybe it would be better to just put this into <head> the normal way, and use $modSettings['sp_resize_images'] to control putting the class on the article bodies?
 
Are there important browser issues I am unaware of because I'm only testing with IE8/IE7?
 
Code: (portal_resize.css) [Select]
.sp_articles_body img
{
 max-width: 100px;
 width: auto;
 height: auto;
}
Code: (function sp_articles) [Select]
...
foreach ($articles as $article)
{
...
   echo '<br/ ><div class=sp_articles_body>', $article['msg']['body'], '</div>';
...
}
...
  if ($modSettings['sp_resize_images'])
   {
    echo '
  <script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"><!-- // --><![CDATA[
   var cssNode = document.createElement("link");
   cssNode.type = "text/css";
   cssNode.rel = "stylesheet";
   cssNode.href = "', $settings['default_theme_url'], '/portal_resize.css";
   cssNode.media = "screen";
   cssNode.title = "dynamicLoadedSheet";
   document.getElementsByTagName("head")[0].appendChild(cssNode);
  // ]]></script>';
   }
Please to keep this website running, if you like SimplePortal, make a
one-time subscription. Thank you for your support.

Have you tried the SimplePortal documentation?

Offline AngelinaBelle

  • Comrade
  • *
  • Posts: 4870
  • Gender: Female
  • SMF Version: 2 RC3
  • SP Version: 2.3.2
Re: sp resizing for sp_articles
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2010, 04:28:56 PM »
OK.  I think I've got the answer to my question.
Bad browsers.
 
 
Please to keep this website running, if you like SimplePortal, make a
one-time subscription. Thank you for your support.

Have you tried the SimplePortal documentation?